Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Stern Report slapped down
Ruth Lee attacks 'green taxes'.
In an article in today's Daily Telegraph, Ruth Lee, Director of the Centre for Policy Studies, reiterates some of the points I made in this post, that David Miliband's demands for extra fiscal revenue might be seen as just that - extra revenue.
The point surely should be that we move taxation away from some areas in order to regulate our carbon emissions, i.e. a shift in taxation not an increase in taxation. Ruth additionally makes the point that some nations (India and China presumably) are unlikely to take a jot of notice of Britain's lead and will continue to emit more carbons than the rest of us could ever offset. The world's fastest growing economies are also it's worst polluters!
Whilst I'm not convinced of the efficacy of the proposed 'green taxes' mooted, it should be pointed out that Ruth Lea and her organisation is famously skeptical on dealing with climate change. She argues for the status quo.
The argument is that it's pointless doing anything unless China and India do the same. This is an amoral position, considering that each UK citizen produces four times more CO2 than an Indian citizen and three times that of a Chinese citizen. Both China and India recognise they have a problem with emissions, particularly since those countries will be the first to face the impacts of climate change, and they are willing to become involved in CO2 reduction initiatives. Blaming China and India that their appetite for economic growth make our emission reduction efforts futile is hypocrisy hiding behind economists' faux hysteria.
Until we can show that we are serious about cutting our emissions we are in no position to preach restraint to poorer countries, particularly when most of our nation's riches have come about as a result of the carbon economy.
Whilst there is merit in your argument about taking the moral high ground, irrespective of those nations who will fail to live up to expectations, or fail to implement carbon reduction measures, you miss my point about green taxes. I argue that there should be a CHANGE in how we are taxed, and that 'green' taxes should not be seen as an opportunity to tax us further just for the sake of raising revenue.
I agree with you Curly about 'green' taxes. Without a framework of policies to reduce emissions alongside taxation designed change behaviour and fund emissions reduction initiatives, 'green' taxes will be next to useless, and will give the public the false impression that something is 'being done' and possibly reduce confidence in other initiatives.Post a Comment
Giving another funding stream to Gordon Brown to buy the next election or blow on the replacement for Trident is definitely not what I had in mind.
Links to this post:
Born in 1956
Former Borough Councillor
View my Profile
blueyonder DOT co DOT uk
Got a story?
Got a tip off?
Got some scandal?
Let me know!
Search this site
How do I make a comment on this blog?
Curly's Corner Shop website
My Message Board
Shields photo gallery
RTG Message Board
Sunderland AFC Blog
December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007